Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime.
To what extent do you agree?
Crime is one of the most crucial problems of modern manking on the equal basis with pollution, obesity, diseases and so on. Various countries practice different ways to achieve decrease of crime rates. Placing more police employers is one of such measures. In my view, this method of control of criminals is not always effective and definitely is not the only one in the century of up-to-date technology.
To begin with, plenty of policemen on the streets rarely stops criminals on the way to commit a crime. Such people usually prepare well and get ready to any predictable situation, including fights with police. There are some examples which are worth mentioning. Despite great amounts of police workers in developed European countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands and so on) numerous terroristic crimes in recent years were not prevented.
In addition, the online crimes gain a great popularity nowadays. Professional hackers and programmers have an ability to crack any computer (even computer systems of the Governments). Unfortunately, there is still no ways of preventing such types of crimes were invented but existing ones (including police) are useless in these cases.
In conclusion, it seems to me that putting a greater number of policemen on the streets is not always a key to the problem of growing crime situations. Modern criminals have already been using various techniques of overcoming methods of safety including police, and police officers are senseless for online crimes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29707112971 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81540527969 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619246861925 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9631093957 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256454155256 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832311320781 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403286650043 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144698760182 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354580803453 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.