In some countries, governments tell people how many children a family can have. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way. Do you agree or disagree?
The world population has been increasing at a fast rate. This has become one of the most important problems to the government to come up with new solutions. In some countries, the number of children in a family is being restricted by paying taxes. In my opinion, I totally agree with this action because it will not only reduce the burden on the economy, family income but also protect the environment.
Firstly, the economy will have more difficulties as the population continues to rise. With a large number of people, job opportunities are going to be fewer. Many people will be out of work. Therefore, the unemployment will rise significantly leading to the country's poverty.
Secondly, paying taxes will discourage parents to have more children which will benefit the family income. Parents can not assure to provide a good condition for babies in the future, especially when that family has a lot of children. For example, with the same salary, a house with fewer descendants can supply their sons or daughters the best education and healthcare rather than a bigger one.
Finally, the environment will be protected if the population can be controlled. The more children a family can have, the more pollution the atmosphere can be. More people means greater garbage. Every day, human produce plenty of trash due to factories and daily activities.
In conclusion, I believe it is needed and ethical for the government to restrict the number of children in a family by paying taxes. This will eventually help to eliminate difficulties for the economy, family income and environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... the population continues to rise. With a large number of people, job opportunities are going to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04562737643 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83644073778 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577946768061 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0956182756 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0588235294 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252436448198 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836199070781 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716781424491 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147665202968 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555078405441 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.