In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Most people nowadays hold a similar view that the consumption of too much junk and processed food can negativily affect people’s health. I support the problem and strongly agree that governments should impose heavy tax on this kind of product. The following paragraph discusses both statements and gives the appropriate reason
Eating fast food has become a more favorable hobby for a large number of young people in some countries and they constantly face with health problems like getting obese, overweight,… Moreover, eating more unhealthy snacks will lead to dangerous diseases such as high blood pressure, heart disease,...For example, the figure of people hospitalized has increased significantly compared to previous years. The first reason is that fast meals are packed in beautiful, sparkling boxes and have an affordable price. For instance, almost unhealthy snacks look diverse and abundant from color to food taste, that's why they are very stimulating for the younger generation. Nowadays, there are a lot of online food delivery applications; therefore, it's so convenient and easy to order home deliveries. On the whole, this problem needs to give the best solution and be thoroughly solved before becoming more serious.
So what do we have to do to fix this situation? To reduce the consumption of junk food, governments need to take measures to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. The higher tax means higher price. Only when fast food become more expensive will the young not be able to afford it. As a result, they consump it less and less. Another sollution should be suggested is the time limit. Suppose that if the chain of snack restaurants has opened only in the morning, it will limit the fast food consumption.
In conclusion, the tax imposition of authorities can discourage citizens from using junk food and that may boost healthy food access to more people. That's also a way to solve this problem and I agree entirely with this statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments and gives the appropriate reason Eating fast food has become a more favor...
^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d has become a more favorable hobby for a large number of young people in some countries and they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... problems like getting obese, overweight,… Moreover, eating more unhealthy snacks ...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ch as high blood pressure, heart disease,...For example, the figure of people hosp...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...s high blood pressure, heart disease,...For example, the figure of people hospitali...
^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... and abundant from color to food taste, thats why they are very stimulating for the y...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y solved before becoming more serious. So what do we have to do to fix this sit...
^^^
Line 6, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ost healthy food access to more people. Thats also a way to solve this problem and I ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11384615385 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75980618477 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606153846154 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 101.864474149 49.4020404114 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413590373662 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112940567634 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722748906235 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230035693435 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315001662793 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.