At the outset of the new millennium, it has become a common trend to prioritize junk food by neglecting its inferior impacts on health.in several Nations, rising number of individuals are suffering from health hazardous as a consequence of large consumption of spicy and fatty foods and it is therefore crucial for governments to impose a maximum tax on junk meals. I totally agree with this view point and it will be articulated in the upcoming paragraphs.
It is noteworthy to mention that, increasing health issues are attributed by unhealthy food among all the age groups and it will be controlled by making strictness. Imposing the tax on fast food will force the individuals not to purchase these items due to out of their budget. for example, in Australia,under the circumstances of increased health problems, government impose tax on fast food and it proved superficial for forcing the people to stay away from these unhygienic food products. as a result, taxes make the junk meals out of individual reach. Hence,it is enough to clear that taxation method pave the ways for getting rid of growing menace of fast food.
In addition to this, taxation on junk meal will also encourage the people to eat healthy home made food in an affordable price and that can lead several chances for traditional food to come in the priority list of meals in people's life again. For example, in Punjab, government encourage people to eat traditional healthy food for making themselves free from those health problems which are constantly spread by fast food by imposing tax on junk food. Hence, these are highly appropriate methods for reducing large consumption of unhygienic food products among individuals by taxation.
In conclusion, after analysing total agreement, from my perspective, taxation on fast food is superior approach due to the seemed positive outcomes after the imposition of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...articulated in the upcoming paragraphs. It is noteworthy to mention that, increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...these items due to out of their budget. for example, in Australia,under the circums...
^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , under
... their budget. for example, in Australia,under the circumstances of increased health p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ay from these unhygienic food products. as a result, taxes make the junk meals out...
^^
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...unk meals out of individual reach. Hence,it is enough to clear that taxation method...
^^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing rid of growing menace of fast food. In addition to this, taxation on junk me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es free from those health problems which are constantly spread by fast food by im...
^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...products among individuals by taxation. In conclusion, after analysing total agr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08681672026 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86882679538 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.2731340238 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.818181818 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382332884424 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146744523418 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882769320768 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222327621557 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852483107279 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.