Nowadays, most of the people are worrying on their health issues because they use junk foods excessively and it is often argued that allowing them to pay tax on such foods can reduce this problem. I am agree with this statement because I believe that obesity is the main problem caused by fast foods and increasing the price can reduce health risk.
To begin, there are many people suffering from overweight because they are busy in their work and they don’t have a time to cook at home. So, they go in the restaurants and bars and take fast foods. This leads them to gain more weight and suffer from different diseases. That’s why, I think, taxing on this kind of food is a good practice. Moreover, such money can be used for the treatment of cancer, heart disease which is caused by the consumption of cigarettes and alcohols. United Kingdom is a prime example, where tax from smokers is using to checkup the disease and provide free medicines.
Secondly, higher the prices of junk food makes people hard to take and decreases in consumption. In other words, as the price increases, they feel it too expensive and take such foods occasionally only. As a result, they eat homemade food that will be less harmful for their health therefore decreases health risk. For instance, the cost of organic food has proven in people’s behavior that only very few number of people buy it regularly. So that, charging high cost on fast food is the main solution to solve people’s health problems.
In conclusion, tax should be paid on junk food because it improves public health and reduces the purchase of such foods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... tax on a junk food is necessary as the general public health is at risk. I am agree with this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... general public health is at risk. I am agree with this statement because I believe t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...n people's behavior that only very few number of people buy it regularly. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89626556017 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55829908327 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585062240664 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8395264051 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226216532998 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899332411535 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447830322747 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136093043411 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484116004378 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.