In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that in some countries, more people prefer living with their parents after achieving qualifications and landing jobs. While there are some positive aspects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of living together outweigh its benefits.
There are indeed advantages of parents living under the same roof with their mature children. One of the advantages is that it helps the children save a great deal amount of money. This is because they do not have to pay for their housing rent or purchase their own houses. In addition, monthly bills may be shared and money spent on grocery shopping can be reduced as they and their parents eat together.
However, I support the view that this is overall a negative trend. Firstly, conflicts may happen more frequently. Some young adults might lead an unhealthy lifestyle such as gluing to their phones for hours or skipping meals, which are strongly opposed by their parents. Therefore, tension can go up if they keep staying together. Secondly, it limits the social relationships of the children. This is because when parents and their offspring live with each other, the young adults may find it awkward to invite their friends or colleagues to their houses. Moreover, they may avoid parties at the companies as they can come home late at night, which affects their parents in terms of sleep.
In conclusion, while living with parents is an effective way of young adults to set aside money, I would argue that the demerits shadowed the merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95669291339 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44831564315 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6173673525 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9285714286 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342497395473 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105281114885 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747014572658 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203104175728 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346864745599 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.