In some countries old people are highly valued, while in some cultures young people are highly valued. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Throughout ages, human's relationship has undergone dramatic shifts. It is a common notion in some nations that the elderly should be highly respected due to their age, whereas a number of traditional beliefs tend to focus on the value of the younger generation.
On the one hand, having been experiencing different milestones in lifetime, old people are said to own a distinct perception in association with their abundance of wisdom. They are the ones in charge of providing advice for later generation in how to deal with many problems. Under workplace settings, most important decisions are made by mentors at least in their middle-age to avoid underestimation as a result of lacking experience of younger staffs. Taking a broader view into account, as age advances, politicians who play a vital role in international relation are eligible to come up with unique tactics in order to connect the bridges between nations in the world.
On the other hand, when it comes to obtaining advanced technological knowledge, members of the young generation tend to be the key contributor as they have a chance to get exposed to modern inventions during their early ages. As a matter of fact, many schools have incorporated technology as a means to foster young students' creativity. This will consequently be useful when these young minds apply such knowledge into practice when entering the workforce later on. In Asian countries, for example, the value of young employees is highly appreciated at big organizations since they bring a fresh perspective and a lot of energy into workplace. Particularly when social media has an influential power over many life aspects, most of the trendy acts including protecting the environment or treating other people with courtesy are likely to be set by young people.
In conclusion, each individual in either older or younger age groups has their own role and mission. Any side bias should be avoided as all positive personalities should be promoted for a better world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...d technology as a means to foster young students creativity. This will consequently be u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, whereas, at least, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15596330275 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95884795317 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626911314985 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5664677064 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964645623312 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296031086082 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317438277843 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514128786853 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333018468058 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.