In some countries old people are highly valued, while in some cultures young people are highly valued. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Throughout ages, human's relationship has undergone dramatic shifts. It is a common notion in some nations that the elderly should be highly respected due to their age, whereas a number of traditional beliefs tend to focus on the value of the younger generation.
On the one hand, having been experiencing different milestones in lifetime, old people are said to own a distinct perception in association with their abundance of wisdom. They are the ones in charge of providing advice for later generation in how to deal with many problems. Under workplace settings, most important decisions are made by mentors at least in their middle-age to avoid underestimation as a result of lacking experience of younger staffs. Taking a broader view into account, as age advances, politicians who play a vital role in international relation are eligible to come up with unique tactics in order to connect the bridges between nations in the world.
On the other hand, when it comes to obtaining advanced technological knowledge, members of the young generation tend to be the key contributor as they have a chance to get exposed to modern inventions during their early ages. As a matter of fact, many schools have incorporated technology as a means to foster young students' creativity. This will consequently be useful when these young minds apply such knowledge into practice when entering the workforce later on. In Asian countries, for example, the value of young children is highly appreciated at academic organizations since they act as a vital part in the national economic prosperity. Particularly when social media has an influential power over many life aspects, most of the trendy acts including protecting the environment or treating other people with courtesy are likely to be set by young people.
In conclusion, each individual in either older or younger age groups has their own role and mission. Any side bias should be avoided as all positive personalities should be promoted for a better world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, at least, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1561461794 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94657978419 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637873754153 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.826574235 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101448615813 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312803392002 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308054790855 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574479162191 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168674813812 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.