In some countries, only few young people go to classical music concerts or to play and perform at the theater.
Why is this the case?
Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more?
The way that youngsters learn and practice music, particularly classical music, has altered substantially over the past few years.
In several nations, many young learners do not classical music theaters as the place they can perform and train their musical abilities.
Personally, this trend is mainly due to the advent of technology and social networking sites, and under no circumstances should children neglect to participate in classical music concerts.
It is sensible to say that technological advancement and social media have made the way learners share their music skills and talents much easier and faster. Indeed, there is a multitude of websites and platforms like Facebook and youtube, which offer users to freely share and upload their photos or videos on the community media. By doing this, youngsters can reach to larger audience base; besides, they can even receive feedback by reading comments of watchers online. Therefore, this is a reasonable answer to the concern why most young music players have tendencies not to attend music concerts. However, I still ascertain that it is more beneficial for young people to perform and learn from classical music theaters. The reason being is that only in such places can students obtain the most prestigious sources of information and skills about music from professional and well-known music players. These trained teachers can assist students to play and master their instruments faster and more accurately. These can easily get by daily interaction and performances between teachers and students. For example, a person can only master the piano if he or she practices and learns from an eminent pianist.
In conclusion, technological development and social media are the answer to the trend that more young individuals skip actual music concerts; nevertheless, it is still of great benefit for youngsters to attend these concerts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39261744966 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80460034102 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7748627808 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273911617687 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980618106184 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818683715005 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14507992304 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449064351586 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.