Some countries pay extremely high salaries to people. Some people believe that country must not do that and make a limit for salaries. Do you agree or disagree.
In this modern era, many countries give higher salaries to many people such as CEOs, executives and many more. While some people argue that its a need to stop and set a regulation regarding how much money need to give individuals. This essay will discuss why people think in this direction and why I disagree with them, all the explanations are given in the following paragraphs.
To comments with, most of all big high-tech companies give higher salaries to their leaders who run their businesses, which leads toward the inequality among their workforces. If workforces have many issues with earnings, they will not work properly and give their 100% in factories. Ultimately, it is a reason for the fall in a company's profit, production and reputation as well as create an imbalance between individuals too. A company in China, for example, paid more money to their board of directors with regular increments rather than their employees, as a result, the company went through huge losses. Therefore these types of evidence prove why people think that authorities need to stop giving higher salaries and set a limit on them.
On the other hand, giving a higher number of salaries which brings many positive aspects. Firstly, if a person gets more money from his handwork, which encourages him and his colleagues to do more hard work. In fact, the huge money in salaries is a possible way for big corporations if they want to expand their businesses. As result of research by the University of Haward for instance, suggested that when companies offered a huge number of salaries or a promotion to a specific person in their offices that person not only do more work but all workers do more work. Thus companies will make more progress. Although many citizens feel disappointed when someone gets increments, it is beneficial for many factors in an organisation.
In conclusion, this essay discussed when businesses provide more money to their selected people that it draw to the inequality between workers. However, giving increments to labourers will incline their sales. In my words, despite having inequality in workforces, high salaries are superior and it helps a lot in the overall performance and the economy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...many more. While some people argue that its a need to stop and set a regulation reg...
^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
..., the company went through huge losses. Therefore these types of evidence prove why peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igher salaries and set a limit on them. On the other hand, giving a higher numbe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...more work but all workers do more work. Thus companies will make more progress. Alth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04076086957 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74108017004 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7180324047 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.117647059 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191234419694 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058774754721 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407628203245 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114564288641 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376650364156 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.