In some countries, people are possible to have a wide variety of foods have been transported all over the world. To what extent the benefits of this development outweigh the drawbacks.
With the globalization, trading among different countries in the global develops significantly. Nowadays, it is easier for residents in one country to purchase commodities from other areas. This essay will discuss both pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is undeniable that there are a range of advantages of buying foods from all over the world. First and foremost, that there a wide diversity of foods from more countries is beneficial for consumers. In details, local inhabitants have countless opportunities to choose what they want to buy. Therefore, they can shop around and purchase the things they need at the cheapest price. In addition, this development has positive influences on both export and import countries. Regarding exporters, to produce a huge number of products, the demand of labours went up considerably. As a result, there will be more jobs and the rate of unemployment will reduce. In terms of importers, it will help these nations decline the pressure about producing foods within small farm area.
On the other hand, importing foods from overseas can bring some adverse effects. Firstly, nourishment which is transported from aboard may be not fresh and unsafe. Due to the fact that it takes a long time to move commodities from foreign countries to inland, these foods can contain preservative which is harmful for people health. Moreover, that the quality of imported foods accelerate will threat the development of local commodities. For instance, the abundance of foods from overseas along with a suitable cost results in a remarkable decrease in consuming domestic products. This makes farmers face with more challenging circumstances.
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks of buying foods which shipped from other countries in the world, I strongly believe that the advantages of this development outstrip the disadvantages, especially in countries where the areas of agriculture land is narrowed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35598705502 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95758532985 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5899408398 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9444444444 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184599792478 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542064401246 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433565078065 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106750251171 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349379372082 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.