In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In many nations, the number of bankrupted small stores in town is increased due to the fact that more and more people prefer to drive to bigger malls outside the town. Therefore, this trend creates more difficulties to people who don’t have their personal car and increase the number of cars being used. However, I believe that this phenomenon more pros better than cons.
First of all, moving stores and business centers out of town could help to reduce dramatically the traffic in the city center. Normally, small stores are scattered all over the city, as a result, customers have to move to different locations in order to purchase all products they need and it causes a huge traffic number in the city center while the traffic infrastructure could not be developed fast enough to meet the traffic needs. Moreover, shopping in out of town brings more benefits. It is obvious that the bigger the mall is, the more products are sold. These shopping malls allow customers to every kind of item in one place and at one time with a cheaper price.
On the other hand, people might think that persons without individual vehicles could face difficulties in accessing out-of-town megamalls. However, the public transportation system is now well developed and allows people to access any location they want. Plus, several applications such as Grab, Uber or Lyft let people to have an affordable ride and it is more convenient for everybody to access out-of-town locations.
In conclusion, although the moving stores away from downtown area seems to have both positive and negative effects. I hold a firmly belief that this trend could bring significant benefits for customers and reduce multiple problems occurring in megacities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('firmly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('belief') instead of another adjective.
...h positive and negative effects. I hold a firmly belief that this trend could bring significant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05244755245 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63305286355 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0631645034 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322373768191 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107218670666 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898254850153 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1707589918 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823880294306 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.