In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantage of young people who decide to do this. (IELTS, AC)
In this day and age, a vast majority of youngsters are motivated to have a gap year after secondary school and commencing tertiary education. Notwithstanding, this discourse will delve into both staggering how young people learn better impersonal skills, and economic self-satisfaction is the fundamental advantageous of this practice follows by the demerits such as lack of interest in study as well as lack of higher education, accordingly.
From one perspective, some supporters argue that one of the core boons of having a gap year after graduating is that economic freedom when they work in that duration. This is because due to the fact that school-going boys and girls can easily deal with their fiscal circumstance owing to working in a specific arena which can help in economic self- adequateness. Therefore, they have started earning their bread and butter for themselves. Besides, if juvenile travel many nations, they will increase communication skill due to interacting with diverse countries of people while commuting after gap a year in high school. For instance, youth not only rational cope with economic autonomy, but also comprehend the globe of mixed aspects of their improvements: faith, language and rituals
However, having a halt in schooling after graduation creates many issues for youths due to lack of engagement in education since they have fascinated themselves completely in working as well as travelling. Thus, some pupils face some issue related to handle the challenges of studying once again. Furthermore, if they delay thinking of joining any academies, they will not be eligible to take admission since a gap in a period in education. To cite an example, most of the businesses looking for workers who complete their tertiary education. As a result, It is conspicuous that a lack of higher education they will not allow for any kind of best pay package.
In conclusion, having explored both slants, I reiterate that youth windfalls from the short break in the study which helps them communication ability, and self-efficacy in economic. nevertheless, it is imperative that they ought to be discerned adequate and proficient to cope with the difficulties complicated in resuming education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... both staggering how young people learn better impersonal skills, and economic self-sa...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mprovements: faith, language and rituals However, having a halt in schooling afte...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ability, and self-efficacy in economic. nevertheless, it is imperative that they ought to be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32485875706 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07868265509 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5895437151 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6923076923 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180038576428 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600381761847 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445233107301 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998351620849 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561220697694 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.