Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
There exists a style of management, according to that hardworking employees are encouraged by incentive premiums. This mean may lead to rise of results in company or, conversely, to decrease of staff performance. This essay will first discuss how effective this form of motivation is, and it will then address the question of what other ways of motivation and encouraging can be applied for better work.
Firstly, extra payments given to efficient employees is universal practice which is applied worldwide successfully. It is a fact that overwhelming majority of people get a job in order to earn money and secure their families. Therefore, in case person has an opportunity of getting extra money for performance, he/she tries to work more intensive as people always wish to afford more than they have.
Discussing ways of encouraging members of staff, the theory of management should be considered, according to that there are ways of motivation without material encouragement. These means are based on person’s need of being engaged in social group and need of self-realization. The first way of reward collective for considerable result is providing cooperative recreation in the nature or parties. Furthermore, it allows make staff more friendly to each other. The second way to encourage employee and, moreover, make his/her work better is various professional seminars, master-classes and conferences. Consequently, workers not only feel a satisfaction of their mental needs, but they also improve their knowledge and skills.
In conclusion, extra money as an encouragement is an effective style of management in case it is given to those contribute exceptionally to the enterprise. Means such as parties and joint rest for staff can be applied as an encouragement for significant achievements instead of premiums or in addition.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43055555556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26622256996 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5255004985 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264522450518 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787090763646 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547771640664 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157846258617 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056875475664 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.