Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages?
Language institutions make considerable profit in recent years, it’s due to people are getting to realize how important languages are. In European countries, it’s common that people master more than two languages. It comes to an argument that what the ages are suitable for children to learn a second language, in primary school or wait until later. In my view, the advantages from learning languages earlier overweight the disadvantages.
There are two absolute reasons suggesting children should learn foreign languages at primary school. The first one is that children would learn language more quickly when they are younger. There are researches prove human brain’s functional area of language is completed during age 2 to 7. In that time, children’s ability of learning languages is more active than any other ages. If children aim to master a second language as well as their mother language, they should begin to learn at primary school. Another reason children should learn languages early is children would learn a new way to think while they are learning a new language. In some ways(in some repects; in some sense), language habits represent a nation’s culture and thinking model. From building different language habits, children may catch glimpse of a new sight to the world and get training to think problems comprehensively.
On other hand, disadvantages of learning a foreign language at primary school include giving children too much pressure and distracting children from learning their mother languages. Fortunately, these disadvantages could be avoided by advanced learning system.
To restate my opinion, children should begin learning a foreign language at primary school. Comparing to above advantages, the disadvantages are even ignorable. The gain from learning a foreign language earlier is not limited in the language area, but many other aspects in children’s growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thinking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: thinking
...new sight to the world and get training to think problems comprehensively. On other h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54054054054 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95460387801 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3727977162 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4705882353 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38674528401 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14550667502 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103092532918 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271553559289 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474669397708 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.