Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
Do you agree or disagree with this policy?
In contemporary society, tax policy, which is often stipulated by governments to reduce population growth, has been at an all-time high from all over the world. It is argued that imposing a tax to limit populations to a sustainable figure is a feasible measure. Nevertheless, I maintain that the striking downside of overusing taxes outweighs the benefits. As with all new laws, there is some debate about whether this transition makes perfect sense.
On the one hand, using taxes can decline the birth rate due to the awareness of controlling the number of children in each household. From a purely financial perspective, people will be conscious of the long term consequences that the more children than the law allows they have, the more serious financial burdens they will withstand, such as not only bringing their children up, meeting educational and entertaining requirements but also paying a high percentage of their income for taxes. As a result, people will follow this law strictly to ensure living in a good financial health.
On the other hand, I claim that a lack of money could entail poverty, illiteracy, unhygienic lifestyles, and crime. Therefore, if people have more children than possible, they could suffer from a consequential series of negative effects related to money, such as bankruptcy, or debt because they have to pay for the tax. In addition, the well-funded educational training should have its place in restricting the number of children, rather than the tax policy, due to the gap of knowledge between citizens and some minority peoples, who do not have enough knowledge about why and how to control their offspring effectively
In conclusion, tax is not a fundamental approach to restrict the number of offspring as people think due to the aforementioned consequences, such as the uninsured security, low-quality living conditions, family violence, and divorce.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24262295082 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0041340324 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 138.853339895 49.4020404114 281% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.9 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280019447173 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853843555801 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684052597327 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137525617859 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684741162331 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.