The author of this topic makes an assertion that when some company believes that there employees should be smartly dressed, other gives importance to quality of work over appearance. This assertion proposes a clear argument between dress code and work. I will highlight both the sides and try to provide a sound reasoning for my claims.
On one hand, there should be a proper dress code policy in every organisation. In other words, every empolyee should follow the code of conduct of their employers. In office premises some dress codes should not be allowed like wearing cap or torn jeans. This is because, work place must be treated with proper ethics including dress which makes the difference between college life and work culture. Furthermore, during the client visit eveyone should be presentable with proper dress code. For instance, according to IBM hr policy, everyone should ware formal dress for 4 days, from Monday to Thursday, and in Friday they can ware causal but no torn jeans or caps are allowed.
On the other hand, every employee should be recognized for his/her quality of work and not for the dress he/she wares. The main objective of every onganisation is to deliver quality works to there clients. Additionaly, if a person is well dressed but cannot produces quality of work to his/her client, he/she is not adding any value towards the organisation. Moreover, if the company gives the flexibility to its employees, they can bring out the highest level of productivity from them. For example, Cognizant Technology Soultion, one of the recognized global IT organization, is known for giving flexibility towards its employees including dress codes. Thus, it is number one IT organization in India in today's date.
To conclude, it can be reiterated that although there must be a cogent dress code ethics in the workplace, the quality of work should be given more importance than dress code.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05993690852 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63370858331 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545741324921 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0263589162 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232169073056 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821427311363 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410259796464 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147033770096 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484623050361 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.