Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent years, the employment of phones by children during school-time has been a debate in many parts of the world. While there is a school of thought that phones should not be used towards students in their school, I partly believe that those should not be banned.
On the one hand, the prohibition on students using phones would bring at least two benefits not only to study but also to manage their results. Without any doubt, the capacity of studying would dramatically decline unless students merely focus on their lessons in classes, instead of being distracted from messages, notifications on social networks. Due to the drawbacks, children should not be allowed to keep their phones company in schools. According to a result of the Asian press survey, many students have tended to cheat using their phones on examinations, which is a red alarm in many nations. In addition, teachers will face difficulties both with cheating by technological equipment like phones and with making sure about quality after exams if students are given permission to use phones in classes.
On the other hand, using phones also creates positive results for studying; moreover, phones do not really lead to negative students' mental and ethical development. By using phones, the students can easily access the Internet to find out the answer for a difficult quiz that their teachers do not carefully instruct in classes. Besides, they can use phones for recreation just in the break, for example, socializing with their friends or playing online games. When it comes to wrong actions and behaviours of children, there must be mentioned both of other aspects such as environmental elements, domestic education and social impacts. Phones are being totally blamed for unexpected ones, despite the fact that educators should seek another method to limit negative growth of children.
In conclusion, the ban from using phones in schools brings pros and cons for students. I suggest that there be more flexible methods of using phones in children’ schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, really, so, while, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15963855422 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62996311391 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8032635455 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417609310921 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160098261438 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798395787289 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285942888319 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378691598458 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.