Some people believe that construction of new public buildings such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is more important than renovation of the existing ones, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Construction of brand new public facilities or renovation of existing ones has created a lot of public attraction. It is often argued that facilities used by common people should be completely new rather than renovating, while others believe the opposite. I believe in the latter notion as maintenance and preservation of old, historic buildings and places carry a county’s heritage and culture.
A growing body of research suggests that old museums, galleries, town halls, and sporting facilities covey information and culture about a nation. This is because these places are massive repositories of knowledge to know a civilization better. Therefore, any investment which could be made towards the renovation and refurbishment of these facilities will only benefit the particular nation by passing the heritage to the young generation. Apart from that, these places regard as the major tourist attraction and thus play an important role to generate revenue. For example, the Taj Mahal in India, a monument of love serves as an example of unconditional love for the whole world as well as a means of revenue generation for India. Hence, it is essential to keep our histories alive through these facilities.
However, many believe public money should be spending on manufacturing new facilities instead of maintaining an existing one. One important issue is that renovation might need way more investment and resulted in outcome might not gain as popularity as new ones. Moreover, in a matter of time, the ancient facility may need to repair again. Many ancient forts or monuments, for instance, necessitates multiple renovation and reconstruction and thus causing a huge financial burden to policymakers.
In conclusion, while protecting and preserving public facilities benefit their nationals through sharing culture and heritage, there can a financial issue to maintain them. In my opinion, despite having some negative effects, overall, their renovation is beneficial for society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
...ms, galleries, town halls, and sporting facilities covey information and culture about a n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r renovation is beneficial for society.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51791530945 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03958191851 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628664495114 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2077634832 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25625708448 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771603527063 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756267748881 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156289404818 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897621007279 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.