Some people believe that education is the key to tackling hunger worldwide, while others feel that the answer lies in food aid.
Nowadays we live in a capitalistic and merciless world, in which the rich people are getting richer, and the poor even poorer. While some people are of the opinion that education is a proper way to struggle poverty and hunger, others think that food aids will make the world a better place to live.
Despite the fact that education affects in a long term, there are several reasons why education is the only chance to protect and save humanity from hunger. First of all, education provides knowledge that agronomists can apply to grow larger crops three, maybe four times per year and make harvests to become almost endless. Similarly, genetic engineering can be used to improve the quality of not only cultivated fruits and vegetables but meat as well.
On the other hand, food aids should not be made regularly, either been ignored at all. To be clear, some food donations must be provided to support and encourage the victims of natural disasters such as floods, tsunamis, hurricanes, and earthquakes. In addition, some foodstuff should be donated to well-known charity organizations or religious institutions, which have a huge experience in taking care of people in need. However, it is not acceptable to make food donations to the countries which are starving of hunger, but unfortunately, do not desire to develop their agriculture sector and main economic aspects.
To conclude, I deem that the idea of not giving a fish, but teaching fishing is the best approach to solving the hunger issue worldwide. Thus, regular food aid is criticized by some skeptics as a Band-Aid solution, developed countries should mostly help others to establish technological solutions of growing food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fruits and vegetables but meat as well. On the other hand, food aids should not ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, similarly, so, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11510791367 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76465001127 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640287769784 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.2328921503 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27556260448 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943984954094 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818237904779 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160322337683 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620194824656 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.