Some people believe that the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In recent years, the measures for coping with the traffic congestion has become a contentious issue. Some people advocate that constructing more train and subway lines is the best solution, while others believe that the expansion of roads is more beneficial to deal with the traffic problems. Conspicuously, this issue requires our in-depth analysis.
There is a belief that increasing the number of trains and subway lines can mitigate the burden of traffic system. As train is the public transportation that is able for a large number of passengers to use at the same time, it can facilitate the system to reduce the number of users using the roads and thus alleviate the problem. Similarly, building subway lines enables the road users to have other alternatives to commute, therefore, releases the capacity of the roads to lower the traffic congestion.
In sharp contrast, however, it seems to me that constructing more and wider roads is a more efficient and effective countermeasure. it is undeniable that train and subway lines are able to be commuted by a great deal of people, nevertheless, the aforementioned way cannot provide a convenience compared with driving their own cars. people tend to travel in a comfortable way rather than share the area with strangers. Hence, increasing the number of roads or expanding the existing roads are more specific and effective owing to people's preferences. In addition, constructing new trains and subway lines required tremendous time and investigation that cannot rectify the situation immediately, while it is relatively shorter for widening the roads.
By and large, I firmly believe that in terms of time and effectiveness, increasing the areas for the road user to drive is the better measure to mitigate the traffic congestion immediately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... public transportation that is able for a large number of passengers to use at the same time, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...efficient and effective countermeasure. it is undeniable that train and subway lin...
^^
Line 9, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...e compared with driving their own cars. people tend to travel in a comfortable way rat...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a comfortable way" with adverb for "comfortable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g their own cars. people tend to travel in a comfortable way rather than share the area with strange...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 530, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...re more specific and effective owing to peoples preferences. In addition, constructing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is relatively shorter for widening the roads. By and large, I firmly bel...
^^
Line 9, column 751, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tively shorter for widening the roads. By and large, I firmly believe that in t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, in addition, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28373702422 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00870971406 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1071075021 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312999088043 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106438435563 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779217562165 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176998302865 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496408366606 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.