It is widely believed that the school curriculum must be equipped with physical sessions for students of all ages. In contrast, some people argue that it is totally time-consuming when allocating time to such activities but not academic lessons. In my viewpoint, I strongly agree with the former idea because of numerous positive benefits brought by physical classes.
It is understandable why many people think children should invest their time in learning academic subjects rather than physical ones. This is mainly because the performance in academic results has an enormous impact on the future of students. In fact, learners, even at an early age, have to confront various kinds of pressure, typically score burden stemming from both family and teachers. Therefore, spending too much time on physical lessons is regarded as a waste of time due to the fact that such classes have no power in promoting and enhancing students' performance on paper. Moreover, the mandatory requirements for enrolling in well-known universities and colleges do not consist of physical conditions. As a result, students are encouraged to more concentrate on traditional majors such as mathematics, literature, and languages.
Despite these arguments mentioned above, I also contend that physical education plays an indispensable role in the school curriculum. This is mainly because children will not develop comprehensively without improving in terms of physical aspects. Physical lessons at school with the participation of peers can act as a driving force to promote students' progress in their formative years. Moreover, various advantages resulting from practicing sports and other physical activities also do wonder for children's health, steer themselves clear from a sedentary lifestyle and other bad behaviors. According to the survey of UNICEF, students are prone to be more active and healthier when taking part in fully physical lessons at their schools compared to other counterparts avoiding equivalent ones.
In conclusion, for the sake of the children in the long term, I strongly believe that physical education should become a must-have part of the school curriculum
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51351351351 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98607541367 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588588588589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5160067287 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306178594766 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950352566663 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622807378314 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190463285509 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150215851458 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.