Some people believe that it is a good idea to continue to work at their old age. Do you agree or disagree?
Increased employment rates of individuals working past the retirement age in recent decades have been capturing significant public controversy. Given the suggestion that older people should extend their working lives, I agree.
This working trend could bestow many positive implications for society. First, since many economies including developing ones are grappling with aging population and low fertility rates, older workers could offset inadequate workforce in such nations, ensuring the continuing economic growth. The reason is that technological innovations have replaced most physically challenging jobs, which previously could only performed by younger generations, older people could have access to many occupational opportunities without the age limitations, thereby maintaining the economic stability. In addition, companies could capitalize on employees working past the retirement age for the betterment of work productivity and increased profits. Due to retirees’ associations with in-depth occupational expertise after decades of professional contributions to the labour market, such people especially those in executive or managerial positions would use their intellectual resources for the effective and organized operations of a company.
People would benefit from working at the old age. First, workers extending their working lives are linked to better health and longevity. In fact, although working requires extensive brain functioning and physical movements, such factors have been proved to culminate in reduced to a reduced risk of dementia and improved body dexterity. Moreover, working old ages offer additional source of income, especially for older workers with no relatives’ support. By having stable stable savings, old people could afford basic necessities and other personal needs without any concerns about having no financial assistance.
In conclusion, I believe people are supposed to work at their old age. This could lead to many advantages to both society and workers themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: stable
...s with no relatives’ support. By having stable stable savings, old people could afford basic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...stable savings, old people could afford basic necessities and other personal needs without any co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06597222222 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.997006528 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.6981121574 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.785714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243065744416 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109976983207 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116095027991 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180487904736 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610286547877 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.