Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Sharing is said to be caring. Thus, some people claim that it is beneficial to be transparent with information in every institution such as technology or academia. Meanwhile, some advocate to keep the information private depending on its priority for its ownership. This essay will try to elaborate both perspectives, providing my own preference in the end.
Firstly, the advancements in media and telecommunication in recent days are aimed towards better contribution of information and data. Illegally or legally, we cannot deny that we are bombarded with abundant information nowadays. More outlets of news and resources certainly facilitate our productivity and improve our output to be more contributive. In addition, the rife of news and information, regardless of the fields, gives the audience or targeted people the time for precaution in case of upcoming problems or challenges. For instance, the transparent data of economies of countries amid the covid-19 pandemic highlights the probability for the global recession, according to the various press. It led the governments and business sectors to be more aware of the crisis and more focused on how to overcome or avoid this tendency. By preparing necessary measures such as more collaboration or consultation between stakeholders, the so-called assumption will sooner be evitable.
On the other hand, some against the previous opinion since they believe that not all information should be displayed to all. Understanding the ease of performance, such transparency will also impose some outrageous risks or danger. Technically saying, the news about the success of a new threatening chemical weapons night also shed light to the criminals or terrorists to further trace the result which will unnecessarily lead to more dangerous situations. Thus, some information, whether it is business or politics, should be put under the rug, considering the side-effects it will pose to the public.
Personally, I share the same concern with the second advocate. Therefore, it is inevitable that the News and resources become abundant and will be more in the future. Nonetheless, excessive sharing of information ought to be prohibited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed assumption will sooner be evitable. On the other hand, some against the prev...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49112426036 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25540061069 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58875739645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4584700092 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205311433884 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067132949559 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05912091451 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134759521923 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456304328675 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.