Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, countries have a large amount of study information and knowledge that help them to improve their country in different areas. A section of thought that this knowledge will be in access of other countries while others argue that this information is expensive, and give to others freely.
Firstly, people argue that this knowledge is collected by spending the time and huge proportion of the budget. Universities spend huge money to collect raw data and then spend a significant time on it to reshape it, although sometimes human lives are in risk to collect this data. On the basis of this data, the economy drives the country system. For example, a country collects money by taxes and spend it on innovative technologies that help drive their industry, and industry will produce jobs for local. If others get this information without any effort, then how this country will recover their money.
On the other hand, people thought that each country should have equal opportunities to solve their problems. Most of the poor regions are not able to produce their own information and scientific innovations. Other regions which had immense information should provide to poor people. For instance, if America gives access to Africa where they do have basic facilities. Due to this knowledge, they will be able to design some new factories and make some water cleaning plants that give healthy life.
In conclusion, the scientific knowledge collected by spending significant money and time; however, I believe that some information will be open for everyone which related to basic human needs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63030528973 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534615384615 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.826761761 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149327158971 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060102273745 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512116328708 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114320496088 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528282839176 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.