Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is commonly believed that sharing information is beneficial in the field of scientific research, business and education. While I strongly believe that exchange of knowledge is useful and constructive, I also think that sharing valuable information more than required can have negative impacts.
One of the advantages of sharing knowledge with others is to gain more insights into the concerned topic. Other parties may hold some information which could be crucial for further development in a particular scientific research. Engaging with them to acquire such noteworthy knowledge may prove to be helpful to the research rather than repeating the trial and error method due to shortage of data, which can be time consuming. In the world of business, sharing ideas can lead to collaborations among conglomerates to manufacture more efficient products which can benefit the consumers in the long run as well as prove to be lucrative for their businesses.
Another benefit would be development of social skills through interaction, especially in the sector of education. Sharing of knowledge and wisdom among students can be conducive to learning and development and eventually can lead to better result overall. Students obtaining higher grades can help weaker students by proving them with necessary help and sharing their sufficient knowledge from experience so that the latter do not feel a setback.
However, sharing of too much data freely that are valuable or exclusive to the particular sector, can be detrimental to the individual as well as the society. Even the world history has witnessed devastating consequences for this action. The world still reminiscences the misuse of the theoretical formula developed by eminent scientist Einstein during the Second World War that brought about destruction in Japan. The Japanese are yet to recover from that dreadful memory of nuclear bombing. Besides, disclosing secrets to others may result in losing the genuine credentials behind the work. Finally, if the data are to be shared then it should be done on a substantial amount or at the least with certified patent.
To conclude, active learning and nurturing of abilities may require exchange of knowledge to function fully, it should be done with careful monitoring to prevent harmful consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'particular scientific research'.
Suggestion: particular scientific research
...d be crucial for further development in a particular scientific research. Engaging with them to acquire such not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...l a setback. However, sharing of too much data freely that are valuable or exclus...
^^^^
Line 7, column 718, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or at the least with certified patent. To conclude, active learning and nurturi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...toring to prevent harmful consequences.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41160220994 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94591857498 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5021102218 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244076409464 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826207793013 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795007450197 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133188970392 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902444347125 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.