Some people believe that museums should represent the cultures and civilizations of all nations while some others believe museums should introduce the culture and civilization of their own country. Which side do you agree with? Express your reasons.
There has been always a debate whether the national culture and history behind a country should show in the museums or they should be an indicator of other cultures and civilizations. Although, I agree that it is important to represents our own culture in the museum, I don't think attracting people with the other cultures in our museums is valueless. This essay will discuss this issue using examples to demonstrate points.
On the one hand, representing a nation culture and history of each country is beneficial for society. Showing a worthwhile heritage of a nation from their ancestors can be a symbol for today’s people to preserve what obtained from the past. For example, when they look at the materials from 1000 years ago, they will think unconsciously about the past; endeavors of prior people, their difficult lives, and huge problems on those days then thank god for living in these days with many facilities. Therefore, it is apparent that providing national culture museums is useful and aware of all nations to their national capital.
However, this does not mean that museums should completely neglect illustrating the civilization of other nations. Representing the historical material and culture of each country in the museums can be attractive for people to be familiar with the other cultures without traveling and spending a lot of budget. For instance, they can pay a few charges to entrance the museums and enjoy visiting various cultures from all around the world coincide it, the government can improve its revenue by attracting more people to improve income from museums.
To sum up, although there are clear benefits of introducing our rich culture to our people, I cannot concede that the other culture will not be attractive for our people and the government ignores incoming money. In future, I believe that people and government should consider using both in the museums.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...esents our own culture in the museum, I dont think attracting people with the other ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
... the government ignores incoming money. In future, I believe that people and government s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11182108626 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71801063024 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5303514377 0.561755894193 94% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9172767171 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327983655017 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134018114792 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840723060418 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208649224549 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638061195363 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.