Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
We are now living in a modern world, and things are not like they used to be before. It is claimed by some people that we have so much options compared with past. Although I agree that there are more options available now than the old times, but I do not assume this statement is true in all cases.
To begin with, the fundamental reason which makes me favor of this idea is because of recent development in various fields. During the last years, researchers has achieved breakthrough in many aspects of science, and they have more knowledge about our world. Thus, due to the recent advancements, we have more options because the more choices come with more knowledge. Take communication as an example in early stages, the conventional way of communication between people was by fire and smoke until the invention of telegraph, and during the last years, with appearance of internet communication becomes so easy and more accessible. Respectively, we have so much ways to communicate with others like email, phone call and numerous messengers.
By focusing on the other hand, the reason why I take the opposing view of this statement is that there are less resources available. To be precise, there is an undeniable fact that the population of earth is growing with respect to the time, and the basic need of this people including food and housing must be satisfied. In order to do that, more lands, jungles and animals must be used to meet this need, so these resources are now more limited that they used to be before. Consequently, we have less options regarding of food and accommodation.
In conclusion, it is asserted that we have a variety of options today. Despite being a supporter of this idea, I do not think it is true all of the aspects of our life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... claimed by some people that we have so much options compared with past. Although I ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...re accessible. Respectively, we have so much ways to communicate with others like em...
^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pect to the time, and the basic need of this people including food and housing must ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun options is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sed to be before. Consequently, we have less options regarding of food and accommoda...
^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of this idea, I do not think it is true all of the aspects of our life.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, in all cases, it is true, to begin with, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76051779935 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73500887792 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521035598706 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3763387932 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240190365213 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889617700771 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453573421543 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15441161356 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040492738773 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.