Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent days, life shows a lot of possibilities to do while people are coping with the coronavirus pandemic. In that sense, I agree with that idea because teleworking and the internet give two main arguments to the society to think like that. The following lines will explain the reasons for this approach.
Talking about teleworking, it demonstrates how useful it is for the companies and their employees during the global health crisis. In case of companies, they are sure that the economic activity continues because they receive information from their workers unless they are not in the office. And, for the employees, they can be safe, keeping the social distance, and doing their duties on time, using the technology. But, for instance, it is known that teleworking can solve some problems and promote others: sedentary, obesity and vision. Therefore, it is important to combine teleworking and exercises as people stay at home.
On the other hand, the Internet provides a lot of information in order to occupy their time in reading news, listening to music and talking with friends and family. Those activities, and others, can be found on the web, which provides many options to do during the day and night. Although people cannot go outside due to the coronavirus, they can stay at home and feel comfortable because the Internet brings a lot of things to do, applying safety health protocols. However, people can get stressed after staying too much time on the web or at home. For this reason, the recommendation is to keep a balance between internet and the other activities at home.
In conclusion, during these times, people have an important number of options to do in their life such as doing teleworking and browsing the Internet at home, especially, considering the health emergency around the world. Nonetheless, societies should consider having a work-life balance
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09646302251 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74955526885 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3554273054 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139601562081 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480579005759 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029873959861 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920735241104 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034197756823 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.