Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
There has been a colossal upsurge in prodigies discussing the topic of expert’s workplace. Some people contend that professionals should participate in the working environment in which they complete their training while others assume these people have free choice to contribute to the company in various nations. In this essay, I will cite some appropriate points about this issue and give the conclusion that whether the former or the latter statement brings more benefits to our society.
On the one hand, it is obvious that skilled workers may study abroad or involve in the exchange course in foreign countries to enhance their knowledge. Once being obliged to stay and partake in a working environment in another country, these professionals may have more chances to expose to advanced technology and can easily promote in their career path. Obviously, taking a job in developed countries can help these gifted employees earn a tremendous of money which is seen as the prime factor in having a job. This earning is worth the effort and knowledge of these workers because they have learned round the clock in their schooltime in order to become talented professionals. Besides, owning a profession in a developed country can bring an opportunity for us to meet the guru in our fields which may fulfill our knowledge gaps and widen our horizons. However, it can cause an alarming issue called “brain drain” in the society, and our nation has hardly developed into a powerful area across the globe
On the other hand, taking part in a working environment in a country where they complete our training can help us be confident in the real case. It is evident that different nations have diverse circumstances and cultures. This may be a burden for us to strive for gaining jobs in another country. To cite an instance, an economist in underdeveloped or developing nations hardly catches up with the growing pace in the economy of industrialized countries. This can lead to repercussions if we don’t apply the right methods to solve the problem in reality and drive us on edge of unemployment. Furthermore, when skilled workers own a career in their country, they can contribute their intelligence and get the country out of the underprivileged state. This action can be seen as a patriotic behavior that ameliorates the living standard in our country. Finally, however, it can limit the chance of our career path.
In conclusion, everything is associated with two sides: one affirmative and the negative points. IT all stated that people can help freedom in choosing their workplace but still use some time in their career to come back and contribute their literacy for the next generations in their hometown. I personally believe that people can choose their workplace without limitations due to its promotion in career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to round'
Suggestion: to round
...these workers because they have learned round the clock in their schooltime in order ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1008, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed into a powerful area across the globe On the other hand, taking part in a work...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 467.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07280513919 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85650857646 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531049250535 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0430635814 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.684210526 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5789473684 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242116730899 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668827476596 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717379819592 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151151947656 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473807559173 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.