Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and give your opinions.
In the world today, tourism is one of the most potential industries which many countries can make advantage of. However, it also can cause severe damage on the cultures. As a result, some people believe that the government should prohibit tourism in some areas with the aim of protecting cultures. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly claim that this policy will take no effect on the inevitable change.
First and foremost, it is obvious that banning tourism can save some traditional cultures which have been driven to the verge of losing the meaning of themselves on the grounds that they are commercialized for profits. When the local are forced to work in tourism industry, many customs must be adjusted to adapt visitors’ tastes. Not the least of which is that that in peak tourism seasons, so many visitors are there that even a quiet village even the remote islands or some natural traditional sites such as ethnic villages in the mountains turn into a noisy market. Therefore, this policy can bring back the peace and diminish the amount of domestic garbage as well as the natural resources consumption.
Nevertheless, I totally agree that not only does this decision take not effect but it also has negative influence on the development of the nation. Initially, it can lead to another inning of economic crisis in some countries when tourism is the backbone industry. There will be fewer entrepreneurs, fewer job, which can lead to a sharp increase in unemployment. By the same token, the veto on tourism will be the main cause of the low living standard of local people on the grounds that there will be a significant fall on their income as well as the undeveloped public services.
Last but not least, utilizing tourism will be able to save those traditions which lack of money and labor for surviving. The government finds it impossible to renovate these historical sites due to the serious shortage of finance. Therefore, if there is a sustainable decrease in the number of visitors, these traditional skills and lifestyles along with a lot of authentic regions can not be impressively presented to international people and might soon be forgotten because of the lack of foreign investment.
To sum up, I strongly believe that tourism is an integral part of the development of each country. If tourism is restricted, the whole nation will be adversely affected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...apos; tastes. Not the least of which is that that in peak tourism seasons, so many visito...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 692, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...domestic garbage as well as the natural resources consumption. Nevertheless, I totally...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...at not only does this decision take not effect but it also has negative influence on t...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l as the undeveloped public services. Last but not least, utilizing tourism wi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01259445844 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85977750529 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534005037783 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1801792889 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.058823529 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277764173731 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840727587811 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755663331787 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153106771903 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470296831279 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.