Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
According to research, in today’s world 90% of the buildings and houses are more than thirty years old. Gradually, as years pass-by, these buildings tend to suffer damages. Therefore, it’s a popular opinion to de-construct and rebuild to save a lot of money; however, there are few buildings which need not undergo this process. This essay will discuss few points in agreement, as well as in disagreement of this view.
To begin with, India is one of the most populated countries and having old infrastructure is a risk during natural calamities. Restoring these buildings by fixing the affected areas is dangerous. Researchers point out the risks involved in restoration, as these buildings tend to collapse during earthquakes, harming many in and around the area. Thus, demolishing them and rebuilding them is the only option.
On the flip side, there are few buildings which represent the countries culture and heritage. For example, the Taj Mahal which is the popular monument of India, represents value to the country, by encouraging tourism. It is said that each year, thousands of people fly to Agra to have a glance at this piece of art. Huge amounts are invested in the maintenance of such treasures. Demolishing this monument would lower the economy of the country, as well as the historical value involved. Hence, it might be wise to restore such buildings.
Having analysed the above point of views, it is suffice to say that, regular old buildings can be demolished for reconstruction but buildings which carry a lot of value, not only for itself, but also for the country might not be handled in the same manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...to collapse during earthquakes, harming many in and around the area. Thus, demolishing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...e are few buildings which represent the countries culture and heritage. For example, the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sufficed'.
Suggestion: sufficed
...nalysed the above point of views, it is suffice to say that, regular old buildings can ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02941176471 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80751432377 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3015793876 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174056955784 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573190073103 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041011109088 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105597111476 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334885062895 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.