Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Gradually, as years pass-by, these buildings tend to suffer damages. Therefore, it’s a popular opinion to deconstruct and rebuild to save a lot of money; however, there are few buildings which need not undergo this process. This essay will discuss few points in agreement, as well as disagreement of this view.
To begin with, India is one of the most populated countries and having old infrastructure is not viable during natural calamities. Restoring these buildings by fixing the affected areas is dangerous. Researchers point out the risks involved in restoration, as these buildings tend to collapse during earthquakes, harming many in and around the area. Thus, demolishing them and rebuilding them is the only option.
On the flip side, there are few buildings which represent the country's culture and heritage. For example, the Taj Mahal which is the popular monument of India, represents value to the country by encouraging tourism. It is said that each year, thousands of people fly to Agra to have a glance at this piece of art. Huge amounts are invested in the maintenance of such treasures. Demolishing this monument would lower the economy of the country, as well as the historical value involved. Hence, it might be wise to restore such buildings.
Having analysed the above point of views, it is suffice to say that regular old buildings can be demolished for reconstruction but this does not apply for buildings which carry a lot of value, not only for itself, but also for the country. Restoring such worth building might be a wise decision
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...to collapse during earthquakes, harming many in and around the area. Thus, demolishing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sufficed'.
Suggestion: sufficed
...nalysed the above point of views, it is suffice to say that regular old buildings can b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06177606178 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79819179337 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9310626176 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171734884565 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588858070001 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427795835306 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106344260353 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431072986755 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.