Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
A number of people believe that the final punishment for each kind of offence ought to be fixed. Whereas, others suppose that prior to deciding on the punishment, the situations and motivations of each individual need to be taken into consideration. Personally, I am of the notion that it is necessary to make a decision which bases on different circumstances for committing delinquency.
To begin with, there is no doubt that each type of criminal behaviours can be implemented the same punishments. Death penalty, for example, is for offences killing human or life imprison for some illegal activities. Hence, these fixed rules enable to prohibit the public from committing to crime.
Besides, giving an unchanged penalty also ensure the court is conducted more quickly.
On the other hand, making a decision of crime should be made up based on a various number of cases. Obviously, it is unfair to implement the same punishments for each set of wrongdoing. That is because the motivation of each individual varies from person to person. For instance, property or a state of hunger is likely to force someone to opt for criminal activities. Another example can be illustrated here is there is a various number of accidents have happened by chance, which is different from other case caused by intentionally. Therefore, the court is impossible to make up their mind of the similar penalty without considering particular situations and motivation.
In conclusion, even though fixing punishments for each type of crime find it easier to clarify the level of criminal seriousness. I believe that the laws are suggested to be applied to ensure they are fair to every citizen.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97485661853 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5190916553 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405971266256 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11755912202 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708135691218 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202223218965 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098801929525 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.