Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility all. What is your opinion?
In recent decades tourists’ responsibility has been attracting a great deal of media attention due to its substantial impacts on the locals. Although the negligence of social and environmental responsibilities sounds reasonable, I think that they are the tourists’ liabilities.
There are a multitude of benefits when it comes to the tourists’ social responsibility. First, High social responsibility is the effective medium of easier integration into the local communities. This would act as a contributor to visitors’ acquisition of more cultures and social norms, increasing their living experience. Second,Tourists’ acceptance of local customs could act as a deterrent for the misunderstanding or cultural clashes with the local denizens. For example, some American tourists have been murdered by some extreme religious zealots in Iran due to having insulted their Islamic statues.
There are many advantages pertaining to tourists’ environmental responsibility. First, Visitors with high environmental liability would participate in some local green campaigns for the environment preservation. For instance, some foreign tourists in Hanoi have participated in many tree-planting crusades to restore many destroyed tropical forests, which has contributed remarkably to the environmental rehabilitation in Vietnam. In addition, Environmentally responsible visitors will substantially reduce the disposal of dirty trash or noxious chemicals to the local environment. In fact, this would act as an incentive for the decrease in the pollution as well as the water contamination, which improve the living standards of the nearby residents.
In conclusion,I believe that social and environmental liabilities are the foundational elements in tourism due to some specific benefits in terms of mutual understanding and environment protection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Tourists&apos
...creasing their living experience. Second,Tourists' acceptance of local customs could act ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtaining to tourists' environmental responsibility. First, Visitors with hig...
^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... standards of the nearby residents. In conclusion,I believe that social and e...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
... the nearby residents. In conclusion,I believe that social and environmental ...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idents. In conclusion,I believe that social and environmental liabilities are...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rstanding and environment protection.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20689655172 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.85586453522 2.80592935109 137% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590038314176 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0651940914 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239845122404 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891868596395 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449799995637 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148441984109 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251175597402 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.74 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.