Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
These days, there has been an ongoing argument that voluntary activities should be an obligation for students in high school. I take the view that this idea is relatively reasonable except in several cases.
In my belief, there are a plethora of benefits to this idea. First, since participating in community service give pupils more chance to explore the world surrounding them which in turn stimulate their curiosity or enrich their understanding. The teenager, for example, will never know thoroughly about how vivid nature is until they joint the conservation campaigns, which provides practical observations. This evidence supports the view that these activities are enormously rewarding for the learning of students. Second, by implementing this idea, the school could educate their student how to be good citizens and show their respects to society. Indeed, teaching a child to be a good citizen is not simple; thus, adding voluntary work into the curriculum could not only raise the awareness of the significance of their help but also inspire them to devote more to society.
However, apart from the concerned merits above, this trend still has some drawbacks. Students are prone to be more stressed involving these voluntaries in addition to some obstacles they confront in their study. If the school apply these activities without considering deliberately, it will trigger some issues such as the severe disputes of parents in virtue of their belief that their offsprings need more time to unwind. Therefore, holding voluntary activities should be proportionate to ensure enough leisure to enjoy their own lives.
All in all, the minor disadvantages will never prevent us from concluding that participating compulsorily voluntary work is not excessive, but extremely useful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43369175627 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88017308981 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63082437276 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1022087352 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.615384615 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124157981247 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436537825314 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334906857895 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739093804617 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346615130026 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.