Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory that of high school programmes( for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, social activity is very important to many young people not only in college but in high school. The sooner the skills improve, the more the student have many experiences interesting. Some people believe that free community service should be a compulsory part of teaching programmes in high school( for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children). I completely agree with this view.
There are two main reasons why students should take part in a working volunteer. One reason is that give a chance to develop life skills and take full advantage of the time to better themself. For instance, working for a charity requires co-operation, communication, and management time to gain the best effect. Instead of sitting in front of the TV's screen to watch a film or play the game in their holiday. The young have a lot of time usefully with reality activities. Furthermore, the working group can make friends easily with many people, extend the network and create happy memories of young together.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that firstly, the working volunteer in anywhere such as a remote region, poor countryside to assistance human being in here as a result for contributing youth and health to them have a better life. For example building a loving house, teaching to younger children... Since then, they feel appreciate value things which they have having. Secondly, experiences will mature them greatly, healthy life balance and exercise are strongly promoted. Moreover, charity compulsory also push back social evils appear in the mind of growing children.
In conclusion, for the reason I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that unpaid community service is good for the high school program and hope these programmes will be put into many actions any more for the high school shorty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: HAVE_HAVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have been having'?
Suggestion: have been having
...feel appreciate value things which they have having. Secondly, experiences will mature them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17263843648 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69002526535 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592833876221 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.670210343 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406579676892 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108282010696 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162288355853 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250041936784 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135048693805 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.