Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood, or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Recently, volunteer work such as doing charity work, tightening the neighborhood, or teaching the sport to younger children has become a popular trend among groups or organizations, especially attracting many young people. Some people believe those unpaid services must be compiled for high school students. From my perspective, I partly agree with this idea because of its two-sides effects.
On the one hand, doing unpaid community work at high school has brought many benefits to students. First of all, those activities help heighten their awareness about sharing and caring with other people, otherwise raising their sense of empathy and dedication. For example, high school students can take care of abandoned, elderly people in the nursing house, or clean the beach by gathering litter and cans on the weekends. Moreover, kinds of volunteer activities strengthen their friendships, make a wonderful, memorable time for them, gain more experiences, and reduce stress during weekdays. Therefore, it should be encouraged and widespread among students.
On the other hand, there are several drawbacks of compulsory unpaid work in any grade at high school. Taking up too much time on extra activities makes students unable to focus on main subjects, especially the senior ones who will enter the graduating exams. Moreover, when doing unpaid work, which mostly doesn’t have any supporting fee, students sometimes have to pay money for the trip and several activities.
In conclusion, volunteer work is deep, meaningful work, which is necessary for high school students in any grade. However, to lessen the impact of disadvantages, encouraging these activities would be better than making it become a compulsory part of the lessons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lar trend among groups or organizations, especially attracting many young people....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47211895911 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79295241404 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650557620818 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3776590168 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335147478965 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113112901394 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088747769787 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203388117738 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092063932566 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.