Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the real estate market plays an essential role in our economy in recent years, and the building’s function is much more important compared to its exterior. While I accept that this may suit many companies, I believe that others base designing an architecture on appearance more than the function.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that a proper function-based design brings many benefits for suppliers and consumers. Firstly, almost people want to experience a construction which is safe and comfortable. For instance, shopping malls would attract more customers if they possess a wide walkway, a good lighting system and adequate emergency exits. Secondly, each building has its own practical use, so it should be designed with a view by the professional architects to fulfill users’needs. Take a theatre as an example, it has a well-designed sound system and a sufficient seating capacity so that everyone in the audience can conveniently enjoy movies or shows.
On the other hand, the spectacular outer space is also one of the prime factors which create many enormous commercial values. First and foremost, consumers tend to choose a place having a significant structure, which could pay attention to them. Royal City could be appealing towards more people, especially on the Christmas day, as they fell in love at the first side via its splendid decoration. In addition, some buildings representing the history of the city are necessary to be beautiful from outside. To be specific, Hanoi Opera House has long been considered a Vietnamese cultural site, so maintaining its attractive exterior is undoubtedly an essential task.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that the function is the first concern for some people when constructing an architecture, but this is by no mean that the gorgeous appearance is not important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21333333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1082041975 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7496848452 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13939823364 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458794172047 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364296322829 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087565316916 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222340830325 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.