It is debated that in the current days, because the development of technology can allow individuals to watch historical objects or art works via devices, the museums and art galleries may not be concerned compared to them in the past. This essay partly disagrees with this view.
To begin with, there are several reasons why it may not be necessary to come to the museum or art galleries. First of all, in order to quickly widen the fame and get a lot of fans, authors have posted their work before. Therefore, people are able to not be interested in the arts in the museums or exhibitions, which they have seen. Moreovers, museums or art galleries can be the commercial activities of the firms. That means the firms will operate the museums and exhibitions to gather the budget from viewers while people can see them on the computer without money. As a result, it may not be necessary for people to come there.
However, I firmly hold the belief that museums and art sites can still be crucial in contemporary society. The biggest reason may be due to the authors. It is clear that although the arts are too famous, people can see them in all website platforms or social networking sites, such as Mona Lisa or The Scream, people still would like to come to the museums to directly watch them to express their feeling. Another reason is that there will be a lot of art works not being published because of copyright and people will have to come to the exhibition to see them.
In conclusion, in spite of the advancement of technology in the modern days, I believe that museums and art exhibitions are still vital because of the aforementioned reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64846416382 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56549066683 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2927826167 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.769230769 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319994061044 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119029563381 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767810518021 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206975483333 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532095674066 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.