Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is the requirement of times to improve our recycling habits. Some individuals speculate that we are not recycling as much as we should be, especially the household items.They believe that perhaps the governments should step should step in and make laws that force individuals to become more responsible. Is it really needed though? We shall discus this below.
First of all, the creation of new legislation regarding recycling will make people more accountable. While in majority of cases the psychological impact alone may prove to be enough, the fines and punishments in cases of disobedience also make people more answerable. This is evident from very efficient reprocessing and reusing techniques in countries of China and Japan because their governments strictly enforce environmental laws. The essence of it all is that rules and regulations are quite effective in improving recycling standards.
Second and more important reason is that it is absolutely essential to effectively recycle in order to have a clean,healthy and safe environment. That I believe can be achieved if leaders and politicians do their job properly. The less waste is produced, so less of it ends up in landfills, water bodies and air. Although results are not immediate, scientific data shows huge long term improvements in coming decades. Studies suggest that Chinese cities show significant climatic betterment after the introduction of legislature pertaining to home-recycling and sustainability. So it is crucial to have government intervention to save our planet.
In conclusion, I agree to a great extent that administrative mediation is necessary to increase awareness about recycling and climate change that is associated with it. Even though there are obvious benefits, I don't support any law that infringe upon basic human rights. So it has to be done carefully and meticulously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...ould be, especially the household items.They believe that perhaps the governments sh...
^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'should step'.
Suggestion: should step
...ey believe that perhaps the governments should step should step in and make laws that force individuals...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...and more important reason is that it is absolutely essential to effectively recycle in order to have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , healthy
...ctively recycle in order to have a clean,healthy and safe environment. That I believe ca...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...en though there are obvious benefits, I dont support any law that infringe upon basi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, really, regarding, second, so, while, as to, in conclusion, first of all, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41638225256 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21335725218 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641638225256 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3773740476 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3529411765 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266046392423 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612118859641 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048123027263 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132566939953 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488506875692 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.