Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Although, with the increase of world population, much waste has been produced, some people insist that there are not enough plans for subsequent recycling. While, recycling is necessary for the waste, a number of people maintain that there must be passed firm laws by governments to enforce people. In my opinion, these laws should be passed to more encouraging people and well-informed them about the devastating impact of such waste that might have on human life.
Not only is the waste reduction a vital for society but also recycling the remaining waste is a priority for several reasons. Firstly, people should be aware that decreasing in the waste means moving forward to a safer environment. Obviously, much waste causes much deposition of waste near our inhabited area which directly means near our house that would be completely unsatisfactory. The second noteworthy issue is that harmful ingredients of deposited waste finally would penetrate into the soil. Therefore, those harmful ingredients may mix with the underground water sources and results in sheer contamination. Thus, the importance of dwindling the waste and recycling is clear crystal.
Evidently, such issue should be tackled and it seems that the government's role is more important than the past. Admittedly, they can pass laws which limited people to produce a huge amount of waste. For example, each household could have definite amount of waste and over it, should be fined. Another way to reduce the amount of waste is encouraging politics. Firstly, it could be performed by fostering people who separate their waste efficiently. Besides, government could develop facilities that may install in houses for instantly recycling. Anyway, it cannot be denied the power of advertisement to bold the issue of waste and recycling and encourage researcher to focus more on that.
As outlined above, I should reaffirm my position that there should be laws to aware people. However, encouraging politics accompanied by effective advertisements is always a key to address the problems proficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e waste and recycling is clear crystal. Evidently, such issue should be tackled ...
^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...should be tackled and it seems that the governments role is more important than the past. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33944954128 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88545682439 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.364307688 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292266772277 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949755805608 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640967977914 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171112912612 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09232278816 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.