The world has recently faced up with the impact of climate change. It is our responsibility to protect the environment, and one of the most efficient ways to be given is recycling. But there are arguments between people to claim that if it is sufficient to recycle garbage at home only. They thought it is necessary to take recycling into account as a legal requirement of policy.
Bofore going to the decision, we should look at how polluted our environment is right now. There are obvious evidence on news, books or Internet every day to prove the level of severity. Tons of waste from agriculture consisting of fertilizers and pesticides are poured into farmland day by day that causes soil pollution, or chemical liquid pumped into rivers from plants causes water pollution. On top of that, it is found that uncountable nilons are thrown everywhere, and many other kinds of waste can be seen in the worldwide.
So with the constant rise in damage the waste brings to us, should governments propose seperate rule to acquire their citizens to obey, and is it the only way? This would be a controversial matter as it might affect to the profits have been made. Many entrepreneurs would probalby oppose when it comes to influencing their income in a negative tendency. The reason is as long as they operate the company with recycling stage of garbage, it costs them some more than they could have been. However, things could be at ease if we put the situation in a long run. Companies which implement enviroment will definitely receive recognition and reliability from not only their customers but perhaps the nation and even the world. I trust that by issuing the law combined with evolving residents awareness, this will be the fastest way to increase recycling around the globe.
To sum up, I do not confirm measuring the rule is the only method to recycle waste, but it must be the short-cut.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7987804878 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69445279189 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612804878049 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4003348199 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25321838651 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677199875593 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671453610144 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137373847253 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574300366297 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.