Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
These days, recycling rubbish has been one of the concerns among individuals. Many people believe that household waste is not recycled enough and the only way to tackle this phenomenon is legalizate the recycling. In my opinion, there are more potential solutions to this problem.
On the one hand, the state should make recycling waste from houses into a legal requirement because of several reasons. The most pivotal cause is that if people do not follow this rule, they will be strictly fined and even imprisoned for a period of time. Hence, this could set an example for other individuals to do this law, and eventually increase recycling nationally. Moreover, when this requirement comes into force, people might use more reusing products rather than hard-decomposed items such as plastic. Therefore, not only the environment could benefit but also providing-reuse items companies would also get more profits. As a result, the state could have more taxes to the budget and could invest more on other purposes such as education and national health services.
On the other hand, there are other valuable solutions to increase recycling household waste that could not be denied. Firstly, authorities could give people a reward such as coins or daily items once they go to the recycling areas. By this way, we could encourage more individuals from all ages and social status to recycle and even assist them in financial and daily problems. Another important solution is using media platforms such as newspapers or televisions to inform people about the disadvantages of not recycling frequently. This, in the long term, could increase the number of people to recycle and also improve their awareness of nature and environmental issues.
To sum up, it is obvious that recycling rubbish from houses has become one of the greatest concerns in society, especially in the era of climate change and global warming. Although many believe that this issue could be only solved by legalization of recycling, I am of the viewpoint that there are more effective solutions to this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...trictly fined and even imprisoned for a period of time. Hence, this could set an example for o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 675, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess of nature and environmental issues. To sum up, it is obvious that recycling ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17109144543 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74280452339 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551622418879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8160812301 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.5625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328657463899 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113621543998 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667335959026 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206057910746 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641031869638 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.