Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there are individuals who argue that the renovation of city infrastructure such as building skyscrapers should be carefully monitored by the government whilst some people claim that the funding entity should also have the chance to design according to their preference. I will delve into both sides to discuss, followed by my final insight.
On the one hand, it is acceptable that the sole authority for designing new infrastructure in grand capitals should be claimed by governments according to the following reasons. Firstly, it is the government that has the information access to all crucial components of a city, whereby it can detect the places in need of better transportation or fixation in the drainage system, and even potential places to be tourism spotlights. These are the statistic figures that cannot be coped by the fundraisers alone for obvious reasons. In addition, there can be enterprises that consider only their commercial interest instead of sustainable urban development which explains that government intervention, or even control in extreme cases, is necessary to some extent. To cite an example, the government of Yangon carries out a strict and careful approach in dealing with tourism projects near the heart of Yangon, Shwedagon Pagoda since building many skyscrapers in the vicinity of the pagoda can bring negative impact to the sustainability of the soil underneath the pagoda.
On the other hand, those who argue that the fundraising actors should have a voice in construction processes are based on the following factors. To begin with, transparency is vital in urban development which prohibits the governments from being corrupted and allows room for more innovative ideas. The whole process of building grand infrastructures in crowded cities is quite intricate since it involves the interest of both government and the private sectors. Providing a large sum of money, it is reasonable for the funding businesses to claim a role in designing or implementing the construction project. Moreover, productive cooperation between the governments and fundraising entities results in a more fruitful outcome than the decision carried out by governments alone.
To conclude, demanding for larger involvement of the individuals who provide the funding in urban development activities is seemingly acceptable and beneficial not only because it will be sharing the burden with the government but also ensure more rooms for development, while the interference of government should be considered in some suspicious projects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, while, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4898989899 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12061957044 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54797979798 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5071939893 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.230769231 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4615384615 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299188357191 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101328129403 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631108994779 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192287263495 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507193792911 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.