past few decades witnessed an exponential growth in entertainment fields, eventually it afflicted their renumeration. I completely agree that these people should be paid better because they are putting their efforts and life for entertaining the public; besides the people who is doing hard work, such as manual labours, police and medical staffs should also get a reasonable income.
Firstly, being popular and becoming a celebrity is not only by luck, but often it involves a lot of hard work and dedication. Celebrities are crowd pullers and highly influential persons, they can entertain and provide plethora of messages and goodness for the public. Celebrities earns a huge some of money by single act or advertisements; it often seems fascinating and some people feels that it is too much or unnecessary. The benefits to the producers and crews are enormous and probably very high compared to the payment received by the actor. Certain kind of actions need to take risk of own life, some time to undergo body transformations and number of sleepless nights; these all will effect the health and wellbeing of the actor, hence they deserves the pay they recives.
On the otherhand there are people, who needs to get more consideration, like hard working farmers, police and healthcare professionals and so on. Eventhough these people are putting a lot of effort and risking their lives, mostly they are underpaid or unnoticed. Farmers are the one securing the essential food for the public; so they must get enough wages to run their life. There exists class differences in labour that pays low for the hard working people and pays more for smart work, such as I T proffessionals; though it sounds strange, it is the reality. Police security and medical staff should get a nice income as they are the essential part of the society and plays crucial role in the society.
Overall, celebrities deserves better pay as they contribute their efforts to benefit public and producers; while we can't argue that the other people also get as same as the celebrities gets.
There should be provision of of better payment for the hard working people for the wellbeing of the public life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Past
past few decades witnessed an exponential gr...
^^^^
Line 2, column 693, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ber of sleepless nights; these all will effect the health and wellbeing of the actor, ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 750, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'deserve'
Suggestion: deserve
... and wellbeing of the actor, hence they deserves the pay they recives. On the otherhan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation, like hard working farmers, police and healthcare professionals and so on. ...
^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...society. Overall, celebrities deserves better pay as they contribute their efforts to...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... benefit public and producers; while we cant argue that the other people also get as...
^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provisioned'?
Suggestion: provisioned
... the celebrities gets. There should be provision of of better payment for the hard worki...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...rities gets. There should be provision of of better payment for the hard working pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f of better payment for the hard working people for the wellbeing of the public l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, well, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99725274725 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75101253713 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552197802198 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.481157794 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154058237922 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532199778979 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606122365227 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918586680467 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557202766384 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.