Some people point out that there will be less international travel in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative trend?
It is said that there would be less cross – country travel in the near future due to the reason that the turmoil happens on sectors of the planet. While some people claim it is a positive trend, I whole-heartedly believe that it puts negative effect on the nation’s economy and culture as well.
First and foremost, reducing international travel has an adverse effect on some countries where tourism is the backbone industry. There will be fewer entrepreneurs, less jobs which lead to the alarming rate of unemployment. Besides, not the least of which is the low living standard of individuals on the grounds that there is a sharp decrease in their income as well as the undeveloped public services. Therefore, it is more likely to cause another inning of economic crisis in countries like Malaysia or Thailand, and inevitably, economy would be hindered on a global basis in today’s globalised world.
Apart from that, utilizing international tourism is an effective way to save the national cultures. In some developing countries, the government does not have adequate money as well as conditions to renovate traditional buildings or areas. As a consequence, if there is a significant fall in the number of cross-border visitors, there will be fewer foreign investments in these places, which can make traditional lifestyles or authentic regions soon be forgotten.
Last but not least, citizens will be incapable of nourishing mutual understanding of people from distinct culture backgrounds when transnational tourism is diminished. People will find it impossible to gain deep knowledge about other traditions, philosophies and languages as well as develop a close bond between different regions from all over the world. This fact may create conflicts at times when differing beliefs collide since they do not understand about each other’s tradition, which can make foreigners subjected to custodial sentences and form cultural tension.
In summary, it is undeniable that international tourism is the lifeblood of the countries’ development. Many nations will be negatively affected when there is less cross-border travel in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun jobs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...try. There will be fewer entrepreneurs, less jobs which lead to the alarming rate of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, apart from, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15936022294 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600591715976 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8674371353 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.928571429 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263065469911 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867570863104 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071709283273 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153844797319 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660634149771 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.