Group projects in school can be a boon for some and a bane for others. Not everyone prefers to work in groups and can actually perform better when working independently. While working alone and working in teams both have their own set of advantages, I prefer the latter.
The biggest upside to working solo on projects is the independence that is attached to it. Students can define the structure of the project as per their liking and choose the content without having to consult with team-members. They can also work on the project whenever it suits them without worrying about others' conflicting schedules. Working alone on a project also gives an individual the opportunity to gain in-depth understanding of the subject since they are working on the project from start to finish.
Working in teams also comes with some perks. The most important advantage could be the different perspectives towards the project and the varied inputs that arise from that. Not only that, since it's harder to find flaws in our own work, working in teams has the upper hand of team-members keeping a check on everyone else's work. Working alone is a situation similar to a one man army where each person has to do everything from start to finish. Teamwork has a definite advantage since each person may have a different skillset that could be encashed to it's full potential.
In conclusion, while working alone definitely has some benefits, I prefer to work in teams because I believe that multiple inputs from varied sources have the potential to greatly enhance the quality of a project as well as broaden our own thinking.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90510948905 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63104009783 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9090449156 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361676883892 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142551199434 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806494926147 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243546554194 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071666694023 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.