Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Health of the country's citizens are very important for the country's sustainable development. This supports the argument of investing more on human capital and their health for betterment of the country's development cycle. This emphasis the importance of expanding sports facilities for improving public health. On the other hand, others believe, not only sports facilities, other strategies too should be developed for a healthy society.
Firstly, government's initiatives in developing sports facilities in the country will have a direct positive effect on health of public. This will not only help public to routinely exercise, but will facilitate in absorbing more energy to perform their day to day activities more effectively.
On contrast, the relevant government authorities should not restrict themselves only by focusing on developing sports facilities. They should also focus on other measures such as, clean environment, food and quality controls and protection against drugs. These will benefit public the most. Even the people, who are not interested in sports will live a healthy life.
In personal view, sports facilities will only have minimal benefit to public health, whereas the authorities should focus on other measures mentioned above. The ability in creating green environment by reducing carbon emission will benefit all age group people. Further, quality controls in food products, especially in children formula will help to develop a healthy generation for future.
In summary, I believe sports facilities will only benefit marginally, whereas other methods too should be focused. This will not only help to focus on public health, but also to develop healthy future generation
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'in summary', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274305555556 0.247107183377 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.125 0.155533422707 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104166666667 0.0946595960268 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0833333333333 0.0501214627716 166% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0173611111111 0.0437548338989 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118055555556 0.122226691241 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0416666666667 0.0403226058552 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77617885597 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243055555556 0.0326793684256 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0763888888889 0.0861772015684 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0520833333333 0.021408717616 243% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00347222222222 0.011925033212 29% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1713.0 1933.35771543 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 316.048096192 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.63953488372 6.12580529183 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20517956788 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.492248062016 0.374742101984 131% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.37984496124 0.28420135186 134% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263565891473 0.203846283523 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162790697674 0.137316102897 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77617885597 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.037074148 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527131782946 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.8833125925 60.7387585426 84% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5718825066 49.517814964 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 127.492653851 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.814263465372 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 55.184496124 49.1944974215 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.92307692308 1.69124875643 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298190410533 0.332605444948 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110022372325 0.102741220458 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0932106008105 0.0668466124924 139% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.569788672949 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.10615770911 0.148594505496 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13274667052 0.134430193775 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628276501699 0.0742795772207 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.295298291472 0.324371583561 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100209541377 0.0638462369009 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190790050964 0.228012699653 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525788670611 0.058150111329 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.68436873747 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 5.90881763527 220% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.