Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, economic growth has become more debatable. Some say that the growth of the economy is the only solution to end hunger and poverty, while others think it will damage the environment. in this essay, I will explain both sides of the statement and why I think it will reduce poverty and hunger.
Those who think economic growth will damage nature have their justifications. Firstly, it will need more space for industries, factories, and transportation. This has led to a decrement in forests and farming lands, which led many animals and birds to migrate. In China, the need for land for establishing more factories increased, so an unspoilt area was used to fill these needs as a result, many animals had to move away from their natural habitat. Therefore, the more expansion will happen in businesses, the more forests demolished.
On the other hand, others and I, however, believe that it has many benefits. the major development of this expense is employment. If more companies build, people will have more chances to get a job. This has resulted in a decline in unemployment among citizens, resulting in the more they can buy their needs. When people have a source of income, they can afford food, medical services, and education. Hence, the more people have jobs, the more people afford basic needs.
In conclusion, although economic development increases damages to forests and animals, it will help to cut hunger and poverty. In my words, despite having some demerits to nature and other species, it is beneficial for human beings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s think it will damage the environment. in this essay, I will explain both sides o...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ver, believe that it has many benefits. the major development of this expense is em...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03100775194 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68929689126 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0349085499 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.125 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185703794535 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675366461652 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873910577373 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134859625552 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106695594175 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.